Seth Jarvis
Fantasy Hub Player Intelligence

Seth Jarvis

CAR · R · Age 24
GP 2 · G-A-PTS 1-2-3
Limited sample STRONG OVERPERFORMANCE VERY LOW confidence
Expected P/G 0.86 Limited sample · Rank appears after 20 GP
Current trajectory Early season 2 GP · 3Y baseline 0.89
Actual P/G 1.50 Limited sample
Deployment 79 #5 among F on team
Driver 86 #9 among F on team

Data sourcesOfficial scoring, games played, shots on goal, ice time and observed deployment: NHL.com. Advanced shot-process and expected-goal data: MoneyPuck. Fantasy Hockey Intel Expected P/G and signals are its own model outputs.

2 GP current season Process: 10% current Role: 20% current
How to read this player pageQuick guide

Start with Expected P/G and current production. Usage contains observed roles; Analysis contains process, trajectory and model context.

Expected P/G Estimated scoring rate from current performance, role and underlying indicators.
Driver How strongly the player is driving offensive creation relative to comparable forwards or defensemen.
Deployment How favorable the player’s role and usage are. Higher values generally mean stronger opportunity.
Actual Deployment Observed NHL usage from shifts + play-by-play: line or pair, power-play unit, time and usage share.
Model signals Fantasy Hub interpretations of meaningful changes in production, process, role or sustainability.
NHL Edge Context Skating, territory and shot-location context. Edge is supporting context and does not directly change Expected P/G or Current Value.
Confidence How much current evidence supports the model reading. Treat lower-confidence signals more cautiously.
Team context
Carolina Hurricanes Elite fantasy environment
Fantasy environment #2 of 32 NHL teams
Team xP/G #2 0.92 top-8 xP/G
Offensive environment Strong EV OZ #1 · shot diff #1
Power-play environment Strong PP OZ #8
Pace & activity Strong #2 NHL · 22.5 bursts/g · 67.8 km/g · 59.9 attempts/g

Elite fantasy environment · strong offensive process · strong power-play environment.

View CAR team context →
Production × opportunity

Player Motion

Expected or Actual P/G against Deployment. The trail follows saved daily snapshots up to the latest date.

4 snapshots
Compare up to four skaters with saved model history.
Bubble size represents Offensive Driver percentile.
2026-10-25

Daily snapshots: Expected P/G is a model estimate; Actual P/G is observed season scoring at that date. Each trail connects saved dates; values between snapshots and reasons for changes are unknown. Driver and Deployment are percentiles within F/D. Bubble size shows Driver, independently of the horizontal axis.

FANTASY HOCKEY INTELShare this Player Motion chart

Show exact values for every date
Usage & Deployment
Overall usageSeason rate
TOI/G18:15
PP TOI/G2:34
SOG/G3.00
5v5 roleObserved role
L25v5 usage band

Jordan Martinook · Jesperi Kotkaniemi · Seth Jarvis

Line time · last game
13:46
TOI · With this line · last game
91%
TOI · With this line · last 3
89%
TOI · With this line · season
89%
Trend
StableStable
Power playObserved PP role

No stable power-play unit established from available opportunities.

PP share · last game
0%
PP share · last 3
15%
PP share · season
15%
First-unit starts · last 3
0 / 3
Trend
StableStable
SituationalLast 5
Vs empty net
0% · 0:00
Own goalie pulled
No team opportunity

Derived from official NHL shift charts + play-by-play · Observed · Low confidence · 3 recent PP opportunities

Official NHL video

Recent highlights

Goals & assists · last 5 games
Production

2026–27 season

GP
2
G
1
A
2
PTS
3
P/G
1.50
SOG/G
3.00
TOI/G
18:15
PP TOI/G
2:34
Historical context · Observed NHL stats Season-over-Season

Actual 2025/26 production compared with 2026/27 so far. Expected P/G is the current FHI model estimate, not last season's result.

2025/26 Actual P/G0.9371 GP
2026/27 Actual P/G1.502 GP
Current Expected P/G0.86FHI projection
2025/26 shots/GP: 3.15 TOI/GP: 18.9 min PP TOI/GP: 3.1 min 2025/26 ixG: 31.2 ixG/60: 1.40

Data sources2025/26 actual GP, G/A/PTS, shots on goal and total/power-play ice time: NHL.com season and power-play reports. Individual expected goals (xG), when available: MoneyPuck all-situations data. These observed results are separate from FHI’s saved historical Expected P/G baseline.

Performance

Process vs Deployment

0–100 · F/D percentile · sample-adjusted
Limited sample

The process-versus-Deployment profile is still sample-sensitive.

Process 86
Deployment 79
Offensive Driver High-end · limited sample
86
Shot Creation High-end · limited sample
91
Play Creation Average · limited sample
63
Deployment Above average · limited sample
79
Median High-end Elite
Trajectory

Early season

Early season
3Y baseline 0.89 Historical P/G
2026–27 1.50 vs baseline +0.61
Expected P/G 0.86 vs baseline −0.03

Current-season production is still below the 20-game threshold; the historical baseline is shown without a strong trajectory call.

Intelligence

Model signals

MODEL

Strong Deployment provides a solid fantasy opportunity base.

Current usage ranks clearly above the position-group median.

MODEL

Strong offensive process adds support beyond raw production.

The Driver profile is clearly above the position-group median.

MODEL

Shot creation is the clearest offensive strength.

The scoring-process profile is stronger than the play-creation profile.

MODEL

Production is running above expectation.

Actual P/G exceeds Expected P/G by 0.64.

Current value

The current fantasy profile has above-average support from both process and Deployment. Expected P/G currently sits at 0.86.

Model details

Performance model
performance_v2_1_4

Scale
transition_ref_v2

Driver vs Deployment
6.9

Published
2026-10-25 17:49:50